1. “Tai Chi Zero (2012)” movie review.

    Posted by
    /
    "Tai Chi Zero" is at its core, a very normal kung fu movie that somehow seems more unique than it really is with its random steampunk additions and bizarre stylistic touches. Yet I am not criticizing this, because it's these attributes which give "Tai Chi Zero" its identity. Without them, the flick would immediately dissipate from my memory, even if I did enjoy myself the majority of the time.
  2. “Dororo (2007)” movie review.

    Posted by
    /
    “Dororo” is one of those 'almost good' movies. It does a lot right, yet its positive attributes are dragged down by the flaws. But I did get to see Japanese warriors fight some bizarre looking monsters, which was exactly what I wanted out of it.
  3. “The Amazing Spiderman (2012)” movie review.

    Posted by
    /
    "The Amazing Spider-Man" was somehow even being more shameless by claiming that it was the untold story. Er, sorry movie, but this story was told 10 years ago and this reboot isn't THAT different. Still, it almost bothers me that "The Amazing Spider-Man" did not suck. I can't make an example out of it because it is surprisingly well made, possibly even inspired.
  4. “Men in Black III (2012)” movie review.

    Posted by
    /
    It's been years since I saw "Men In Black" or its much maligned sequel, so perhaps I'd feel differently if I saw then now. What I liked about the first movie was that it never got lost in spectacle. It was less about the special effects and more about our reactions to them. It would often be scary, dramatic, funny, intense, adventurous and action packed, all at once. It was the full cinematic experience. It's sequel was a hollow shell of that. Honestly, the only thing I remember about "Men in Black 2" was the (certainly impressive) special effects, which were flashy but seemed to lack substance. "Men in Black III" is trapped somewhere in between. It did leave an impression other than "it's pretty", but so much about it seems underdeveloped.